Arab Spring shows human rights are for everyone, everywhere

UN 30 June 2011 – The top United Nations human rights official said today that the so-called Arab Spring across North Africa and the Middle East this year has shown that human rights are for “all of us, all of the time, everywhere.”

Navi Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, told a press conference in Geneva: “The collective actions of the people of North Africa and the Middle East have reaffirmed the importance and universality of human rights in a way we could not have dreamed of on 1 January this year.

“We all want, we all deserve, and we are all entitled to have our rights observed – not partially, not sometimes, not at the whim of dictators or other repressive rulers and authorities, but all of us, all of the time, everywhere.”

“That,” she said, “is the message of the Arab Spring, and it is a message that has reverberated all across the world, stimulating discussion and dialogue, and renewed hope in the power of people to realize change.”

Previously, the High Commissioner noted, “the Middle East and North Africa was one of those areas where we had all been told the people had other preoccupations and were not particularly interested in human rights.”

She said the Tunisians and Egyptians “had blown that myth away,” leading citizens of other countries in the region wondering if they could do the same, and so the protests had spread.

“Several governments reacted in a violent and repressive fashion, leading to the loss of thousands of lives, torture, arbitrary detention, disappearances and other violations.”

But, the High Commissioner added, “the situation was different in Jordan, Morocco and Algeria, which also experienced protests, but in those countries the governments have responded with positive reforms.”

Ms. Pillay said that the new developments had coincided with the need for her office (OHCHR) to expand its activities in numbers and locations, which has left its resources “extremely stretched.”

She said her office’s budget is $202 million, reportedly about the same amount as Australians spend each year on Easter eggs or the cost of three F-16 jet-fighter airplanes.

“The amount Europeans spent on their pets in 2010 alone (€56.8 billion) would fund the entire UN human rights system, including my office, for something like 250 years,” she said.

The High Commissioner asked States to “devote much more to making human rights a reality.”

“Surely it makes sense to invest more heavily in human rights, and to back those brave protesters and human rights defenders in the Middle East, North Africa and elsewhere with much more than praise and fine words,” she said.

Source: United Nations

This entry was posted in General, News and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Arab Spring shows human rights are for everyone, everywhere

  1. Fredy says:

    Arab Spring shows human rights are for everyone, everywhere.

    Is not The Arab Spring. Summer is here and the Arab Uprise continues. Fall will soon come and it will no be called the Arab Fall, winter will come and The Arab Upheaval will be here.

    So what’s up with the Arab Spring. This revolution is not a seasonal thing.

    No is not. UN and White House. You don’t call the shots because you are the minority in power. We are the majority who empowered you. So you watch how you label this Arab Uprise because it is not a seasonal change.

    Joe.

  2. a says:

    I mostly agree, but regarding ““the situation was different in Jordan, Morocco and Algeria, which also experienced protests, but in those countries the governments have responded with positive reforms.”

    I have some doubt. I just read an article about the Morocco “reforms”, and the reaction of the opposition to them – they are not at all content, and want to boycott them, so I wonder how the High Commissioner came to her conclusions here. And regarding Algeria, weren’t there these allegations that Algeria provided tanks and other equipment to Gaddafi, in fear of a similar uprising? And what about Europe – the financial crisis and corrupt parties in Iceland, Greece, Spain? This story is also far from over.

    • a says:

      Also, in Egypt and Tunisia, the revolution is not over. Parts of the old regime and its power structures are still in place. The military council in Egypt does not get it, and wants to prevent further Tahrir protests or imprisons critical bloggers. But now the world is watching, our media keeps us updated, and we know which side we are on (mostly).

      • Fredy says:

        Arab spring…

        UK Students protests = Students spring

        Greece protests = Greek Summer

        Egypt has passed a harsh law for anyone demonstrating. Its the new democracy we love!

  3. patriot says:

    16:23 NATO On June 30th, NATO aircraft flew 140 sorties, including 42 strike sorties. Some of the key targets included: In the vicinity of Brega: 2 Command and control facilities. In the vicinity of Misrata: 2 Military Technical Vehicle. In the vicinity of Tripoli: 1 Military facility, 1 Radar. In the vicinity of Gharyan: 1 Military
    facility. In the vicinity of Waddan: 1 Military Storage Facility. In the vicinity of Bir Al Ghanam: 2 Multiple Rocket Launchers

    Shit ,………… Nato doesn”t stop……………..Shit…………….Gaddafi does not surrender…………..Shit…………….Nato doesn’t stop………….

    • patriot says:

      I posted the above comment. I am having so much fun with this name patriot. Posting and replying to myself.
      At times I wish it was patriot saying those words but it doesn’t matter when I read I feel happy though its me who is writing them.

      I need help guys help me, I am obsessed with patriot! I don’t know what to do, he always tells the truth and I have no other way of fighting the truth.

  4. Fredy says:

    There is nothing worse than a corruptive government . Look at Greece.
    If they have a democracy why are they in serious trouble ?

    This kind of corruption does not give a good name to democracy.

    These dudes are just government employees with the same needs we have but only a little exaggerated.

    Democracy does not mind corruption within a democracy because is a negotiable thing. For example now Germany , France , China and the Greek government are in business. The Greek prime ministers is so damned educated he speaks english better than Cameron and Obama . The funny thing is that his finances are so fucked up and he is so happy.

    I call it Emotional Nonsense.

    The Greek people are no fools . They know their funds were stolen. Prove it and the ICC may have another beautiful case to label and then do no shit about it.

    Deny it crooks.

    Your bank account shows who you are.

  5. Fredy says:

    Arab spring…

    UK Students protests = Students spring

    Greece protests = Greek Summer

    Egypt has passed a harsh law for anyone demonstrating. Its the new democracy we love!

    Excellent work patriot !

    You can be goofy but this time your’e not.

  6. Fredy says:

    If

    b=me
    than
    I=b
    What is b ?

    If I don’t know what b is than I am Fredy only.

    I go with the rebels all the way until the point they guard their money,their land and more specially their people.

    No fucking foreigner is going to teach a good Libyan how to behave when the foreigner is corrupt and believes in religious self impunity.

    Crap.

    I ‘m for the rebels .

    Only one impersonating patriot would ask that . It’s a plain stupid question.

  7. Fredy says:

    patriot, the Libyan Revolution will not be stopped by you or Gaddafi or NATO’s redl lines. Go back to your apartment at AIPAC. This is a blog for Libya and the Libyan people, not for your Jew-loving conspiracy theories.

  8. WEB says:

    We are jews and we are superior to you slave. We are rich and we can fool the americans into helping us. They kiss our ass for our business. We are the superior ones. Israel is ours . We can steal all we want because the UN help us and the world does not give a shit about Palestinians.

    Because every slave like you muslim does not care for their brothers in Gaza. So we can steal from them and kill their children. We are the sons of God.

    All we care about is our Holocaust and the money. That’s what we learned to do . We sell gold, diamonds, and sex too.

  9. Fredy says:

    b
    Did you like Netanyahoo’s speech at the US Congress ?

    Is he Bipolar too ?

  10. Fredy says:

    patriot, admit that you are WEB, the Jew-lover. Go cry about Maddafi and the Holocaust, Jew boy.

    Let’s get back to business.
    __________________________________________________________
    http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/natos-libyan-war-is-like-fast-food-qaddafis-son-says/

    In an appearance on Russia Today, an English-language satellite channel financed by the Russian government, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi’s son Seif al-Islam said that the international intervention in Libya was motivated purely by a desire to control Libya’s oil and gas resources.

    “They have one target,” Mr. Qaddafi said of the countries participating in the NATO-led military campaign. “This country is a piece of cake: rich, full of gas, oil, and we have more than $100 billion deposits abroad… Their goal is not Qaddafi, their goal is to control Libya.”

    Imagining the conversation among NATO leaders, Mr. Qaddafi said: “We have to share this cake, that’s it. And we have to get rid of Mr. Qaddafi because he’s the only obstacle between us and the cake.”

    Later in the interview, Mr. Qaddafi, who has lived in London and is most likely familiar with popular critiques of consumer capitalism and the slow-food movement, expanded on his food metaphor, comparing the hasty military intervention to a taste for fast food.

    In remarks that fit quite neatly with Russia Today’s frequent criticism of all things American, Mr. Qaddafi told their correspondent Maria Finoshina:

    Listen, NATO and rebels both are in a hurry, they want to finish as soon as possible because they are hungry, they are tired, they want to share the cake. It’s like, for them, Libya is like fast food, like McDonald’s, fast. Because everything should be fast: fast war, fast airplanes, fast bullets, fast victory. But we are very patient, because we are in our country, it’s our country, we live here, we die here. One day, the French will go back to Corsica and France, the Italians will go back to Sicily and Italy, the Danish will go back to Denmark, the Canadians will go back to Toronto, and Libya will be back to the Libyans.

    Mr. Qaddafi, who was educated in Britain and was seen in recent years as a reformer and likely successor to his father, also told the Russian network that the lesson of the Libyan war is that other nations should maintain their weapons programs rather than disarm and engage with Europe and the United States.

    We got messages from many countries, and we heard many news from Iran, North Korea, saying, ‘This is your mistake, Libyans, you gave up your weapons of mass destruction, you stopped developing long-range missiles, you became very friendly with the West, and this is the result. So, what does this mean? This is a message to everybody: that you have to be strong, you never trust them and you have to be always on alert, because those people don’t have friends, over one night, they changed their mind and they started bombing us and the same thing could happen to any other country.

  11. Richard From France says:

    Yes Human rights are for everybody.
    I especially see in France that racism is still strong, although a minority, against Backs and Arabs (and Jews, of course, we already heard this)?
    So the Arabs, with taking their destiny into their own hands, are giving a lesson to everybody.

  12. Fredy says:

    Let’s see the facts.
    ___________________________________________________________
    http://www.un.org/rights/50/decla.htm

    On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and “to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories.”
    PREAMBLE

    Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

    Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the commonpeople,

    Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

    Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

    Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

    Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

    Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

    Now, Therefore,

    THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

    proclaims

    THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
    Article 1.
    All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

    Article 2.
    Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

    Article 3.
    Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

    Article 4.
    No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

    Article 5.
    No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    Article 6.
    Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

    Article 7.
    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

    Article 8.
    Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

    Article 9.
    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

    Article 10.
    Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

    Article 11.
    (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

    (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

    Article 12.
    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

    Article 13.
    (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

    (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

    Article 14.
    (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

    (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

    Article 15.
    (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.

    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

    Article 16.
    (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

    (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

    (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

    Article 17.
    (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

    Article 18.
    Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

    Article 19.
    Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

    Article 20.
    (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

    (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

    Article 21.
    (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

    (2) Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country.

    (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

    Article 22.
    Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

    Article 23.
    (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

    (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

    (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

    (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

    Article 24.
    Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

    Article 25.
    (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

    (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

    Article 26.
    (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

    (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

    (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

    Article 27.
    (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

    (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

    Article 28.
    Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

    Article 29.
    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

    Article 30.
    Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

    Prepared for Internet by the Information Technology Section
    Department of Public Information
    © United Nations 1998

  13. Fredy says:

    Jews are allowed to violate human rights but not anyone else. Did the Holocaust really happen?
    _____________________________________________________________
    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/holofour.php?q=holofour.php

    THE HOLOCAUST AND THE FOUR MILLION VARIANT

    How will history remember the Holocaust, historic horror or historic hoax? It depends on whether or not World Zionism controls the history?

    For decades, most people accepted the Holocaust as true. There were some doubters. Internet search engines like Google or Yahoo cited thousands of articles, affirming or doubting it. But that’s over. Like the mass media the search engines are now entirely owned or controlled by zionists. (Where do they get the financing?) A tsunami has swept across the search engines, purging all but Zionist sites, universally claiming that 6 million Jews were butchered in “nazi death camps” between 1940 and 1945 and that all questioners are anti-semites. Why did Zionism feel it necessary to launder the search engines? Is the Holocaust vulnerable? What is the true history?

    Today, Zionists claim there were 17 million Jews in 1940 and 11 million in 1945, a loss of 6 million. You see it everywhere, in the schools, movies, television, radio, newspaper, history, literature and on thousands of monuments and memorials throughout the Zionist world. And now on the internet. Note this number has remained constant for over a half century.

    It must be understood that the word “Jews” as used in this article primarily refers to a race of Khazars from Asia, called “Asiatics” by Benjamin Franklin. Today in Europe and America, Khazars constitute the majority of “Jews” (cf. Benjamin Freedman). And a majority of Khazars are Zionists.

    Modern Zionism is a highly organized political movement; it is not a religion. It is focused on its “ladder” to world domination and is extremely well financed. The Holocaust is its heart and soul. It originated in the 1800’s backed by Rothschild and demanded its own nation in Palestine. In 1916 England promised this in the the Balfour Declaration, prepared by Rothschild and Brandeis, to bring US into World War I for England, but reneged. It took universal sympathy for the Holocaust after World War II to induce the nations to turn over part of Palestine to the Zionists in 1948. But there was a danger, the flag of Israel was hung on a Holocaust flagpole. The Holocaust also produced the Holocaust Industry in which hundreds of billions are collected for the “victims”, their descendants and for Israel ad infinitum. Finally, the Holocaust is probably the greatest political cudgel in history. And World Zionism will stop at nothing to crush all investigations or questions about the Holocaust. What’s their problem?

    Wikipedia is a well known encyclopedia on the internet, sympathetic to the Holocaust. Yet comparing its “Holocaust” article with its “death camp” articles produces major problems. We’ve all heard of Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Dachau, Treblinka, etc., names that cause a shiver of dread and horror even today, thanks to constant Zionist media repetition and reinforcement. But there are also many other camps: Bergen-Belsen, Belzec, Chelmno, Jasenovak, Majdanek, Sobibor, Sachenhausen, Sangerhausen, Flossenburg, Grini, Klooga, Landsberg-am-Lech, Fl鰄a, Oranienburg, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Natzweiler, Ravensbr點k, Maly Trostinets and Theresienstadt. Much of the information is based on Zionist estimates, documents and testimony with little hard evidence.

    According to Wikipedia, 3.8 million people died in the following “extermination camps…80 to 90% were Jews or half of the Jews killed in the Holocaust”:

    Auschwitz 1.4 million deaths X 85% or 1.2 million Jews

    Treblinka 870,000 deaths X 85% or 740,000 Jews

    Belzek 600,000 deaths X 85% or 510,000 Jews

    Jasenovak 600,000 deaths X 85% or (Few Jews)

    Chelmno 320,000 deaths X 85% or 272,000 Jews

    Majdanek 360,000 deaths X 85% or 306,000 Jews

    Sobibor 250,000 deaths X 85% or 212,000 Jews

    But when you read the Wikipedia articles on the individual camps, significant discrepancies begin to emerge, as shown in the following abstracts:

    In 1989 Auschwitz corrected its monuments and reduced the number of deaths from 4 million to 1.1 million yet the 6 million total never changed (the savings at Auschwitz were picked up in other camps). Also, the International Red Cross and detailed German death records indicate that only about 150,000 died at Auschwitz of whom 30,000 were Jews. Wikipedia ignores or dismisses such records. (Compare with 1.2 million above.)

    In Treblinka, The H鰂le Telegram listed 713,555 Jews killed up to the end of December 1942. With the addition of 1943 transports listed in Yitzhak Arad’s book, one may arrive at the figure 800,000. (Compare with 740,000 above.)

    At Belzek, at least 434,500 Jews were killed. (Compare with 510,000 above.)

    The Jasenovac Memorial Area keeps a list of 69,842 names of Jasenovac victims: 39,580 Serbs, 14,599 Roma, 10,700 Jews, 3,462 Croats as well as people of some other ethnicities. (“The world’s eminent authority on Holocaust victims, Yad Vashem Center, claims 600,000.”)

    In the Chelmno camp, at least 152,000 people were killed, mainly Jews from the L骴z Ghetto. (Compare with 272,000 above.)

    According to the official Majdanek State Museum about 300,000 inmates passed through the camp, over 40% Jews. The most recent research by the Majdanek Museum indicates that there were 78,000 victims, 59,000 of whom were Jews. (Compare with 306,000 above.)

    At least 250,000 people were killed in Sobib髍. The victims were mostly Jews from Poland.

    The deaths listed for the remaining sites do not come close to another 3.8 million, much less 80 to 90% Jews. Some samples are:

    The total number of deaths at Buchenwald is estimated at 56,545 with little mention of Jews.

    At Bergen-Belsen, an estimated 50,000 people died there, up to 35,000 of them dying of typhus in the first few months of 1945.

    Of the roughly 30,000 wartime victims at Sachsenhausen, most were Russian prisoners of war.

    At Maly Trostenets Yad Vashem currently estimates the number killed as 65,000 while German historian Christian Gerlach estimates the number to be in the range of 40,000-60,000, mostly Jews from Minsk.

    At Ravensbruk, about 30,000 to 40,000 women and children perished there, mostly Polish, few Jews.

    Various historians place the total death toll in the four main camps of Mauthausen, Gusen I, Gusen II and Gusen III at between 55,000 and 60,000.

    Over 200,000 prisoners were housed in Dachau of which nearly one-third were Jews; 32,099 prisoners are believed to have died in the camp and almost another 10,000 in its subcamps, primarily from disease.

    At Dachau signs now read that the facilities were never used as gas chambers to murder anyone. In fact, there’s no evidence that any “death camps” used poison gas, gas chambers or gas ovens to kill. Yet Wikipedia lists millions of Jews murdered in every camp in poison gas chambers that could hold thousands of people at a time. This is necessary to account for the number of deaths, “75% of all European Jews”.

    Wikipedia also states that 11 million people died in the “death camps”, almost the same number of non-Jews as Jews. How does this fit with the claim that 80 to 90% of the deaths in the principal “death camps” were Jews. Millions of non-Jews have just disappeared. Finally, Wikipedia states that the first credible news of the “death camps” arrived in the West around D-Day, June, 1944, yet the Holocaust Industry is still trying to collect reparations from America for its failure to intervene at an earlier date in the European War on behalf of the Jews.

    An important objective study, which is suppressed, is the 1948 report by the International Red Cross, covering its activities during World War II (1942-1945) in the camps maintained by the German authorities. They were allowed to deliver over one million parcels of food, clothing and medicine to the inmates. It stated their efforts were hindered not by the Germans but by the Allied blockade of Germany and the dire situation in Germany during the final months of the war was due to “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (carpet bombing). It also states that large numbers of “the three million or so European Jews avoided internment altogether”. Did they say 3 million? (It seems there was a massive migration of Jews out of Europe in the 1930’s to America and in the 1940’s to Israel.) There is no mention whatsoever of genocide, gas chambers, death showers, poison gas, etc.; quite the contrary.

    In lengthy books about World War II written by Churchill and Eisenhower, there is not a single mention of Jews being genocided in Nazi “death camps”.

    Qualified engineers inspected the “death camps” and stated that the facilities were showers and could not be used as gas chambers and that the alleged deaths were “impossible”. They were imprisoned.

    There is ample testimony of eyewitness inmates which belie the existence of “death camps”. They are suppressed or imprisoned.

    The Nuremberg trials were hate theater orchestrated by the Zionists under the London Agreement. Testimony was obtained by torture. German generals were castrated by constant kicks to the groin.

    In 1933 Samuel Untermeyer said there were 14 million Jews in the world. By 1940 this exploded to 17 million (an astonishing racial fecundity) and then imploded to 11 million in 1945 due to the Holocaust. But in an article in 1948, Hanson Baldwin, the war expert of the New York Times, said there were then 15 to 17 million Jews in the world, almost the same number as 1940.

    Earlier demographers said that there were 14 to 15 million Jews during the period of the “Holocaust”. Today there are less than 14 million, about the same number as in 1933. Almost half are now in the United States, twice the number of 1920.

    Here’s how Wikipedia explains the discrepancies:

    “Deniers often use the ‘Four Million Variant’ as a stepping stone to leap…to the idea that the Holocaust was a hoax perpetrated by a [Zionist] conspiracy. They hope to discredit historians by making them seem inconsistent. One must wonder which historians they speak of, as most have been remarkably consistent in their estimates of a million or so dead. In short, all of the denier’s blustering about the ‘Four Million Variant’ is a specious attempt to envelope the reader into their web of deceit, and it can be discarded after the most rudimentary examination of published histories.”

    Then why are Zionists still using the 6 million number, knowing it is “specious”? Millions of non-Jews died, too. The numbers don’t make sense. Do Zionists fear any inquiries will prove there was no Holocaust at all and thus “stone wall” all inquiries? It’s like the Protocols. In the 1930’s they had a Swiss judge (Meyer) declare the Protocols a forgery but this was reversed on appeal. Yet Zionism still claims the Protocols are a proven forgery. The “web of deceit” is clearly Zionist.

    According to one article, “The carnage of World War II surpassed that of World War I. German war losses alone were estimated at 7 million, about half of whom died in battle. Ruined, defeated, and divided into zones of occupation, a much smaller Germany emerged in 1945 with a population about the same as in 1910.” (Russian losses were immeasurable; it bore the brunt of the German Army.)

    After the war, millions more Germans died by starvation and disease in a ruined society, and 1.5 million German soldiers died in Eisenhower’s Andersonville-like death camps, under the infamous and barbarous Morganthau Baruch Plans. American soldiers were then, as in World War I and today, the unwitting rapiers of Zionist hatred and greed. Note the commanders of the Allied Army in Europe, Eisenhower and Clark, were Jews.

    Apparently, Zionists will stop at nothing to crush all inquiries of the Holocaust by every possible means. Their reach and fanaticism is awesome. They have a “million eyes” watching everything and everybody (cf. the Protocols). What are they afraid of? Is the Holocaust a “house of cards”? If it falls, so does Zionism, Israel and the lucrative Holocaust Industry. And, despite the conditioning of the Zionist media monopoly, people everywhere are waking up to its deceptions.

    Then will the Zionist Era and its Protocol Chaos together with its perpetual wars, panics, poverty, depressions, revolutions, aggressions, assassinations, false flags, monopolies, debt and demagoguery come to an end./? The slaughter of mankind, cease and Peace, rule./?

    Spread the word on all the sites, forums and message boards. There should be an objective investigation of the Holocaust, free of the influence of France, Britain, and America. AIPAC now requires all US Congressional candidates to first pledge their loyalty to Zionism. Zionists rule Washington absolutely (London and Paris, too). Never have a people been swept by so many armies of secret police. Where is our loyal military? The world wonders!

    Acknowledgment: This information was obtained from an uncensored internet.

    Men can never be secure from tyranny, if there is no means to escape it till they are perfectly under it and therefore, they have not only a right to get out of it but to prevent it. John Locke

    Memorial Day, 2007
    D. Cassidy
    EMAIL THIS PAGE TO A FRIEND

  14. WEB says:

    The whole world feels sorry for us because of the Holocaust . We liked this name is very unique. After that we made a meeting in switzerland and agreed that Palestine would be ours. We did it. Now we have Israel.

    We have our super army . We dominate the damned Arabs. We are pure power. We have vanished almost every Palestinian. We are insane but innocent. It’s because of the Holocaust. We did not have a land or principles .

    So now we have Israel. The holy land and Jerusalem will be our capital.
    We call the shots in the US, England, Australia,Canada and Heaven.

    We are unique.

    If you don’t love our insane ways we will accuse you of Anti-semitic and you can go to jail in 14 countries for that. This measure is to protect the indefensible Israeli borders.

    We get so much weapons from the foolish americans and they send us more and more. God is with us.We even spy on them. Is not a problem. The AIPAC does the job. For a few pennies they are willing to lose their country.

    Israel is worth it. Is funny but every US president agrees with us. We are the sons of God.

    Shalom

  15. Fredy says:

    They”re full of shit. We are # 1 not the jews. We let them think they are fucking with us. We are being very convincing. What can we do ?

    Love them ?

    Thanks for the article patriot . I think is too long but the moment you start reading it catches your attention .

  16. Maya M says:

    Admin, things seem to be going out of control here…

    • Richard From France says:

      same here… these two are monopolizing all the forums and they make relevant stuff unfindable. If in more we get into the Arabs-Jews comparizon…

  17. Fredy says:

    Who compared Arabs to Jews Ricardo ?

    Canada ?

Comments are closed.